Category Archives: CfP

Accepted submissions

Today, we send out the confirmations of the accepted proposals for LWC 2014. We are very pleased to announce that the following Language Workbenches will be present at the workshop:

  • MetaEdit
  • MetaRepository
  • Monticore
  • MPS
  • Rascal
  • Spoofax
  • WholePlatform


Extended submission deadline

Let’s start of with a Happy New Year to the MDSD and LWB community, before bringing this week’s good news.

Over the weekend, we decided to extend the submission deadline for LWC 2014 papers by one week. The reason is plain and simple: the deadline was tight to begin with, and we learned that, despite explicit announcements,  some teams missed the fact that a paper submission was added to the process this year.

The deadline for submitting papers is now January 10th, midnight. The deadline for response to authors will remain.


Reference implementation and focus assignment online

As promised, around November 29th we would publish the reference implementation of the questionnaire platform, as well as some guidelines for the team support and scalability issues. These can be found on Git, under

The file that can be found there explains the design of the reference implementation, while the file scalability and gives suggestions and requirements (mainly for model size scalability) on how to deal with the focus assignment.

If you have any questions regarding this, please post them on the Google Group for the Language Workbench Challenge.

Meinte and Angelo will maintain the reference implementation and the focus assignment document – major changes will be largely avoided. If that is not possible, it  will be announced here. Cosmetics and minors will appear on Git without further announcement.

Good luck with the assignment – and we hope to see you in Cambridge in a few months time!

Correction update on the CfP for LWC 2014

About a week ago, we released the CfP for the Language Workbench 2014.  As some people have pointed out, the rules are a bit more strict than in past years, because we feel we need to focus more on the actual subject of the LWC: Language Workbenches (LWB). There are many ways to do model driven development and code generation, of which LWB are only one. All of these are candidate to be discussed at the CodeGeneration conference, with which we have co-located the LWC.

However, we did find a small flaw in the CfP that may lead to confusion. The criteria state that

participating tools should be language workbenches, that is, tools that are designed

specifically for efficiently defining, integrating and using domain specific languages in an

Integrated Development Environment (IDE). Embedded, fixed-language or library-based

solutions do not meet this criterion.

I’d like to point out here (and have updated the CfP PDF accordingly) that the word EMBEDDED here refers to EMBEDDED DSLs, i.e. DSLs that are used to extend a (3GL) programming language, using macro’s, pragma or whatever facilities that programming language provides. It does not refer to embedding of a language workbench into an existing IDE that may also be used for other purposes than DSL creation and use, such as Eclipse or Visual Studio.

Should there be any other doubts or questions about the CfP, don’t hesitate to contact us via!

Regards on behalf of the program committee,

Angelo Hulshout